email   Email Us: info@lupinepublishers.com phone   Call Us: +1 (914) 407-6109   57 West 57th Street, 3rd floor, New York - NY 10019, USA

Lupine Publishers Group

Lupine Publishers

  Submit Manuscript

ISSN: 2641-1768

Scholarly Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences

Short CommunicationOpen Access

Disability in the Margin of Loneliness Research and Policy

Volume 2 - Issue 3

Antti Teittinen*

  • Author Information Open or Close
    • Department of Research and Development, Finnish Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Finland

    *Corresponding author: Antti Teittinen, Department of Research and Development, Finnish Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Finland

Received:June 07, 2019;   Published: June 12, 2019

DOI: 10.32474/SJPBS.2019.02.000139

Full Text PDF

To view the Full Article   Peer-reviewed Article PDF

Abstract

Loneliness is a key deficiency in well-being and health for the people of our time and, as a result, a major social policy issue. In Finland, the link between loneliness, poor health, ability to work and recovery from different lifestyles has been noticed in surveys of both population levels and individual groups, such as mental health rehabilitators, homeless people, and bread-line customers. However, the loneliness of people with disabilities has not been studied in Finnish society. The aim of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is to include people with disabilities and other marginalized groups of disability in national health, lifestyle and similar research. The samples selected for research are usually removed, for example, by persons in institutions or service homes. The living conditions, quality of life and many other issues of the various groups of injuries have been studied primarily - and almost exclusively - within these groups and even using ‘disability-specific’ indicators, making comparison with the rest of the population impossible. It is also worrying that people with disabilities do not have the opportunity to influence their position in the current change in the service structure, including housing and everyday life. For example, residents who move from institutions have not been listened to in the abolition of institutional care. It can be rightly asked whether people with disabilities will be thrown away and lobbied when major structural reforms are underway.

Abstract| Introduction| Conclusion| References|

https://www.high-endrolex.com/21